User talk:Kahrolsun İzolasyonizm

March 2021

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 17:16, 20 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not move a page to a title that is harder to follow, or move it unilaterally against naming conventions or consensus, as you did to Yasak Elma. This includes making page moves while a discussion remains underway. We have some guidelines to help with deciding what title is best for a subject. If you would like to experiment with page titles and moving, please use the test Wikipedia. Do not add disambiguation to a page that does not need disambiguation. The existence of another subject with the same name is not sufficient reason on its own to move it. noq (talk) 20:49, 27 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you move a page disruptively, as you did at Yasak Elma. There is no other ARTICLE so no need for disambiguation. Even if an article existed for the earlier series does not automatically mean this article should be moved. Please see WP:RM for how to request a contentious move. noq (talk) 16:49, 28 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that your username, "Kahrolsun İzolasyonizm", may not meet Wikipedia's username policy because it's disruptive. If you believe that your username does not violate our policy, please leave a note here explaining why. As an alternative, you may ask for a change of username by completing the form at Special:GlobalRenameRequest, or you may simply create a new account for editing. Thank you. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 20:30, 28 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Read wp:brd, you have been reverted now make a case at talk.Slatersteven (talk) 10:32, 30 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Conspiracy theory, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. SHB2000 (talk) 10:31, 30 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Kahrolsun İzolasyonizm! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor at Conspiracy theory that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia – it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you. --Renat 10:40, 30 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.Slatersteven (talk) 10:46, 30 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note, next time I will report you, stop now.Slatersteven (talk) 10:46, 30 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about Concentrationism

Hello, Kahrolsun İzolasyonizm

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Slatersteven and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I've asked for a discussion about the redirect Concentrationism, created by you. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 March 30#Concentrationism.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Slatersteven}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Slatersteven (talk) 10:56, 30 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about Collectionism

Hello, Kahrolsun İzolasyonizm

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Slatersteven and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I've asked for a discussion about the redirect Collectionism, created by you. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 March 30#Collectionism.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Slatersteven}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Slatersteven (talk) 10:56, 30 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about Objectionism

Hello, Kahrolsun İzolasyonizm

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Slatersteven and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I've asked for a discussion about the redirect Objectionism, created by you. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 March 30#Objectionism.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Slatersteven}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Slatersteven (talk) 10:57, 30 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about Coagulationism

Hello, Kahrolsun İzolasyonizm

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Slatersteven and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I've asked for a discussion about the redirect Coagulationism, created by you. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 March 30#Coagulationism.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Slatersteven}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Slatersteven (talk) 10:57, 30 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about Disputationism

Hello, Kahrolsun İzolasyonizm

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Slatersteven and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I've asked for a discussion about the redirect Disputationism, created by you. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 March 30#Disputationism.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Slatersteven}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Slatersteven (talk) 10:58, 30 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"Occupationism" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Occupationism. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 March 30#Occupationism until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. 86.23.109.101 (talk) 13:11, 30 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"Conspirationism" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Conspirationism. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 March 30#Conspirationism until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. 86.23.109.101 (talk) 13:29, 30 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"Transfigurationism" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Transfigurationism. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 March 30#Transfigurationism until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. 86.23.109.101 (talk) 13:53, 30 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

March 2021

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for the soapboxy username and the disruption on multiple pages which show you are not here to build the encyclopedia collaboratively..

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 13:56, 30 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"Conceptionism" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Conceptionism. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 March 30#Conceptionism until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. 86.23.109.101 (talk) 14:04, 30 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"Imprecationism" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Imprecationism. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 March 30#Imprecationism until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. 86.23.109.101 (talk) 14:23, 30 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"Correctionism" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Correctionism. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 March 30#Correctionism until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. 86.23.109.101 (talk) 14:31, 30 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"Abrogationism" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Abrogationism. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 March 30#Abrogationism until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. 86.23.109.101 (talk) 14:35, 30 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet investigation

An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Kahrolsun İzolasyonizm, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 17:43, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"Dolunay (dab)" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Dolunay (dab) has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 April 2 § Dolunay (dab) until a consensus is reached. Randi Moth ^Talk_Contribs 20:00, 2 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]